With UCLA taking on Kentucky this evening for a spot in the Elite 8, the stories surrounding the Bruins this week were one of two subjects, Lavar Ball, father of point guard Lonzo Ball, or head coach Steve Alford and his position’s uncertainty.
The news surrounding the head coach is that he is one, if not the top, candidate for the head coaching vacancy at Indiana University, Alford’s alma mater. Not only that, but this morning FOX Sports College Basketball analyst Doug Gottlieb reported that a deal between Indiana and Alford “is done”.
The “Alford hire” at Indiana can be seen as the “prodigal son” returning home. After all, look at all of the accolades Alford accomplished within the state –
- 1983 Mr. Basketball – New Castle High School
- 1984 Olympic Gold Medalist
- 2-Time All-American – 1986, 1987
- Big Ten MVP – 1987
- NCAA Championship – 1987
With all of his many accolades, this hire for Indiana would seem like a no-brainer on paper. But apart from the PR/ethics concern caused by his actions while at Iowa regarding former player Pierre Pierce, there is also the concern of money… Alford’s current contract with UCLA calls for a buyout cost of $7.8 million dollars if he were to leave for another job. Add this to the $4 million dollars Indiana will owe former coach Tom Crean in his buyout, and you have a total of $11.8 million dollars the Hoosiers would owe in sunk costs before cutting the first paycheck to their new coach.
However, some of the rumors surrounding Alford this week brought up a very interesting action that could be taken, one that revolves around a certain three-stripped brand that could make a difference whether Alford is hired at Indiana or not.
Last May, UCLA announced that Under Armour would become the university’s athletic apparel provider, starting July 1, 2017, in a record deal that would bring UCLA $280 million dollars over the next 15 years ($18.7 million per year). This will mark the end of an 18-year partnership the school previously had with adidas, who appeared unwilling to continue in the apparent bidding war that was taking place among the “Big Three” apparel providers.
On the other hand, Indiana renewed their partnership agreement with adidas in 2015, a deal that will keep the Hoosiers in adidas apparel through the year 2024.
This brings us to the issue at hand… adidas will be losing one of their flagship programs to Under Armour in a couple of months, but the possibility of “stealing” UCLA’s coach and bringing him aboard another of the brand’s banner schools, along with the fact that it is Alford’s alma mater, creates a marketing opportunity that could means millions to adidas.
Which brings us to today, where reports suggest that many industry experts believe that adidas is expected to pay the $7.8 million dollar buyout in Alford’s contract, in order to make sure a potential Alford-to-Indiana deal goes through. To quote the article from SportsBusinessJournal, adidas would “love to return the favor [i.e. UCLA leaving the brand for Under Armour] and help Alford leave UCLA.”
Welcome to the BUSINESS of college sports, especially within the ongoing war of Nike-adidas-Under Armour that is being fought over university athletic programs. Not only are the agreements between these apparel providers and universities increasing in value, but also the way each company is conducting business against their competitors, meaning that this industry has now evolved to levels unheard of only a couple years ago, when the logos first started appearing on jerseys.
Now, we will wait and see what happens after tonight’s UCLA-Kentucky matchup, especially if the Bruins are eliminated. As we have already seen in Tournament play, a Bruins’ loss could mean a press conference in Bloomington on Saturday…